Blue or Not?
- Apala Sabde
- Nov 29, 2025
- 2 min read
The more time I spend outdoors, the more the world reveals itself—small truths unfolding at the pace of a bird’s wingbeat. From space, the Earth shimmers blue, and one might imagine that blue pigment runs freely through nature. Yet it is almost absent. What we read as blue is rarely pigment at all, but the physics of light, shaped and bent by intricate structures we can scarcely see.
Some creatures wear a blue that shifts like heat on a horizon—the iridescent flash of the Purple Sunbird, a color summoned only when sunlight strikes the feathers at just the right angle. Others, like the Tickell’s Blue Flycatcher, carry a blue that never wavers. Their color seems anchored, steady, as if it were something the bird took in with its first breath and never let go.


It’s astonishing to realize that neither of these birds holds a drop of blue pigment. Their feathers are microscopic engines, layers of nanostructure designed by evolution to scatter light with exquisite precision. In the sunbird, the nanostructure are arranged like crystals, so exact in their geometry that the color blazes and disappears depending on how you meet the light—nature’s brief, electric sleight of hand.
Tickell's Blue flycatcher is another story entirely. Its feathers are built from chaos—a tangle of disordered nanostructure that ricochet and mingle light in every direction. Out of that disorder comes a blue that does not shift or hide. It is matte, constant, calm. A color that keeps its promise.
For years, I assumed structural color meant shimmer, the showmanship of a morpho butterfly wing or the flare at a hummingbird’s throat. Only recently did I learn that disorder can make beauty too—a beauty that endures regardless of where you stand or how the light slants.



Comments